Student Conduct Process

Policy

Howard Community College will not tolerate violations of accepted standards of student behavior. When such violations occur, the college will take appropriate student conduct action. The college has adopted procedures to allow due process, as required by law.

Case Referrals

Any member of the college community may refer a student, student group, or organization suspected of violating this code to the provost and executive vice president or designee. All case referrals must be submitted in writing.

Those referring cases are normally expected to serve as the complainant, and to present relevant evidence in hearings or conferences.

Student Conduct Referrals

The provost and executive vice president or designee will conduct a preliminary review to determine whether the alleged misconduct might result in expulsion or suspension from the college.  Except in cases of a discrimination complaint, students subject to suspension or expulsion will be entitled to a hearing before the student conduct committee.  Cases not so referred will be resolved after a student conduct conference with the provost and executive vice president or designee. Should a student choose to withdraw from the college prior to the completion of the student conduct process, the college reserves the right to proceed with said process. That student will not be permitted to return to Howard Community College unless all sanctions have been satisfied. The college will not issue an official transcript or diploma until the student conduct process is complete. The college reserves the right to notify any transfer institutions of pending investigations or conduct processes, in-progress investigations or conduct processes, or the outcome of investigations or conduct processes.

 

 

 

 

Student Conduct Conference

Students accused of offenses that may result in penalties less than suspension or expulsion, are subject to a student conduct conference with the provost and executive vice president or designee.  Normally, a student conduct hold will be placed on the respondent’s account, restricting registration activities until the student conduct conference is held. The following procedural protections are provided to respondents in student conduct conferences:

  • Written notice of the specific complaint at least two business days prior to the scheduled conference.
  • Reasonable access to the case file prior to and during the conference.  The case file consists of materials which would be considered "educational records," pursuant to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974.  Personal notes of college staff members or complainants are not included.
  • An opportunity to respond to the evidence and to call appropriate and relevant witnesses.
  • A right to be accompanied by a person of their choosing, as defined in this code.

Commentary:

The conference procedure is designed to reduce unnecessary proceduralism and contentiousness in student conduct proceedings.  A student conduct conference will normally consist of an informal, non-adversarial meeting between the respondent and the provost and executive vice president or designee.  Complainants would not be required to participate.  Documentary evidence and written statements could be relied upon, so long as the respondent was given access to them in advance, and allowed to respond to them at the conference.  Respondents would also be allowed to call relevant witnesses.

The provost and executive vice president or designee may impose institutional sanctions based on presented evidence in the absence of the respondent.  This type of student conduct action may be imposed for offenses that may result in penalties less than suspension or expulsion.

 

 

 

 

 

Interim Suspension

The provost and executive vice president or designee may suspend a student from the college for an interim period pending student conduct or criminal proceedings, or medical evaluation. The interim suspension will become immediately effective without prior notice whenever there is evidence that the continued presence of the student at the college poses a substantial and immediate threat to self or to others, or to the stability and continuance of normal college functions. A student placed on interim suspension who is unable to complete course work for the semester in which the interim suspension was issued will be given a "W" grade.

A student suspended on an interim basis will be given a prompt opportunity to appear personally before the provost and executive vice president or designee in order to discuss the following issues:

  • The reliability of the information concerning the student’s conduct, including the matter of their identity.
  • Whether the conduct and surrounding circumstances reasonably indicate that the continued presence of the student on college premises poses a substantial and immediate threat to self, to others, or the stability and continuance of normal college functions.

Student Conduct Hearing

In the event that a student conduct hearing is necessary, the provost and executive vice president or designee will contact the chairperson of the student conduct committee generally within seven business days to initiate the student conduct process. The chairperson of the student conduct committee will confer with committee members, set a hearing date, and notify the respondent and committee members in writing. The notification will include the specific violation of the Student Code of Conduct

Student Conduct Committee Membership

The student conduct committee will be identified at the beginning of each semester at the request of the provost and executive vice president or designee. The committee is a pool of faculty, staff, and students, with a minimum of five members, one of whom will serve as chairperson. A quorum consists of the chairperson and two members of the committee. Student members will not participate in student conduct committee panels involving potential violations of the sexual misconduct policy.  Members of this committee who do not feel that they can render an impartial decision in regard to a specific case may be excused if they give notice to the chairperson of the committee prior to the notification of the scheduled hearing of the respondent. The chairperson will contact the constituency for the selection of an alternate. The respondent or complainant may request the replacement of any member of the committee if evidence of personal prejudice is provided. Objections to a committee member must be stated in writing and submitted to the committee five business days after notification. A decision will be rendered by the chairperson of the committee.

Hearing Structure

Student conduct hearings will be closed. The director of student conduct and executive associate to the provost and executive vice president or designee serves as a non-voting committee member during student conduct hearings. Hearings may be conducted in person, or by mail, telephone, or other electronic means. In the case of hearings conducted via mail, materials would be sent to and from the respondent by mail. Once the file is complete, the student conduct committee would still meet for a student conduct hearing. Although the respondent would not be physically present, it is possible that witnesses or other persons presenting information, either on behalf of the respondent or the complainant would be present. Hearing proceedings will be recorded by and shall be the property of the college. Deliberations will not be recorded. 

The chairperson of the committee will notify the respondent and complainant of all charges, membership, and hearing date in writing at least five business days in advance of the scheduled hearing. 

Failure of the complainant or the respondent to appear at the hearing, after proper notice, will result in the committee making a decision through the hearing process in their absence. For hearings where the chairperson deems it necessary, neither the complainant nor the respondent are required to be present in the same room. Accommodations, including but not limited to listening to and participating in the hearing over the phone, may be made to allow either party to participate in the process without being present at the hearing location. Further, neither the complainant nor the respondent need to participate in the hearing as a prerequisite to proceed with the hearing.  

Prior to the hearing, the respondent and complainant may be granted access to review photographs, documents, or other tangible objective evidence to be introduced by the complainant. If new evidence comes to light during the hearing, a recess may be granted upon request. 

Both the respondent and complainant have the right to be accompanied and advised by a person of their choosing. The adviser’s role is to provide personal counsel and support to the respondent or complainant, but not to present the case or address the hearing panel, hearing chairperson, or other participants in the process. The adviser may not serve as a witness in the conduct proceeding. Disruptive advisers will be removed from the process at the discretion of the hearing chairperson, and the process will continue. If the adviser does not appear at the hearing, after proper notice to the complainant or respondent, the hearing process will continue in the adviser’s absence. 

Only the respondent, the complainant, and witnesses can address the hearing board during the proceedings. Legal representation is only permitted when the student faces concurrent criminal charges or for proceedings related to an alleged violation of the sexual misconduct policy. 

The committee may request the appearance of any person that each party wishes to have appear and testify. The committee has no authority to compel the appearance of any person who is neither respondent nor complainant. 

The chairperson of the committee will have the duty of maintaining order at the hearing and will have the right to exclude any party or witness from the hearing, temporarily or permanently.

Order of Presentation

  1. Chairperson’s opening remarks.
  2. Opening statements of complainant and respondent.
  3. Presentation of evidence by complainant and respondent.
  4. Questions by members of the hearing panel.
  5. Closing statement by the complainant and the respondent.
  6. Private deliberation by the committee.
  7. Committee decision.

At a student conduct hearing, the technical rules of evidence applicable to civil and criminal cases shall not apply. Evidence will include all facts based on oral testimony of witnesses who are present before the committee and all tangible objective evidence including but not limited to photographs, charts, papers, electronic or other recorded statements. Written statements by witnesses not present at the hearing may be admitted into evidence, but the committee will decide how much weight, if any, will be given to such statements. 

Evidence of a student’s past record may be introduced if a pattern of similar behavior has been demonstrated. The sanction phase of the hearing will consider evidence of pattern behavior. 

  • Any party may present witnesses. Neither the complainant nor the respondent can cross examine or personally question witnesses. If the respondent or the complainant has questions for the witnesses, they may submit those questions to the hearing chairperson during the hearing. The hearing chairperson may use the submitted questions to inform which questions the hearing panel asks.
  • The respondent cannot cross examine or personally question the complainant, and the complainant cannot cross examine or personally question the respondent. If the respondent or the complainant has questions for the other party, they may submit those questions to the hearing chairperson during the hearing. The hearing chairperson may use the submitted questions to inform which questions the hearing panel asks.
  • Witnesses are excluded from the hearing room, but brought in individually before the committee to provide testimony. (This provision does not apply to the complainant and respondent.)
  • At the close of all testimony and after the admission of all evidence, the complainant and the respondent will be allowed a closing statement. Closing statements may include a summation of all evidence (as admitted) and arguments or theories behind the stated position of each side.

The committee will, after hearing all evidence and summations, retire for deliberation. The chairperson of the committee will announce the decision promptly. The committee will issue and make available a written report which is shared with all parties, including the complainant. The chairperson of the committee will notify the respondent of the decision in writing within two business days. See the Sexual Misconduct policy for policies and procedures related to student conduct hearings involving an alleged violation of the Sexual Misconduct policy.

Institutional Sanctions

Significant mitigating or aggravating factors will be considered when sanctions are imposed, including present demeanor and past student conduct record of the offender, as well as the nature of the offense, and the severity of any damage, injury or harm resulting from it. The following are examples of institutional sanctions. More than one institutional sanction may be imposed for any single violation:

  1. Letter of warning.
  2. Fines: Previously established and published fines may be imposed.
  3. Restitution of property or personal relationships with others, denial of certain privileges, or restriction of activities.
  4. Loss of privileges – Denial of specified privileges for a designated period of time.
  5. Discretionary sanctions: Including, but not limited to, work assignments, essays, service to the college, mandated assessment and/or counseling, workshop attendance, behavioral contracts, and monitoring or related activities.
  6. Student conduct probation: Prohibits the student from representing the college or participating in student activities without prior permission from the office of student conduct.  Probation also subjects the student to immediate suspension if found in violation of another offense during the period of probation.
  7. Administrative withdrawal from course(s): Student is withdrawn from the course(s) where the violation occurred for the remainder of the academic term.
  8. Suspension: Exclusion from college premises, and other privileges or activities, as set forth in the suspension notice.
  9. Expulsion: Permanent termination of student status, and exclusion from college premises, privileges and activities.
  10. Revocation of admission and/or degree: Admission to or a degree awarded by the college may be revoked for fraud, misrepresentation, providing other false information, or other violation of college standards in obtaining the degree or admission to the college

Commentary:

Students who are members of athletic teams, work study programs, the Silas Craft Collegians program, Rouse Scholars program, or other learning communities at the college may be subject to additional student conduct action as set forth by the rules of those organizations.These organizations will be informed of any infractions.

 

Appeals

Any student conduct determination resulting in suspension or expulsion from the college may be appealed by the respondent to the provost and executive vice president.  The appeal must be sent in writing to the office of the provost and executive vice president.  The appeal must be received by the office of the provost and executive vice president within seven business days after the notice of suspension or expulsion was delivered to the student’s HCC email address.

The provost and executive vice president will act on appeals based upon the report filed by the hearing committee chairperson, the student’s written brief, and any written response or memorandum prepared by college officials.  All written materials considered by the provost and executive vice president will be subject to inspection, in accordance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.  New evidentiary hearings will not be conducted in appeal. The decision of the provost and executive vice president is final.

The following standards will apply when appeals are considered:

  • Cases may be upheld if the standards for the appeal are not met.
  • Sanctions may be reduced or removed if found to be substantially disproportionate to the offense.
  • Cases may be remanded for rehearing only if specified procedural errors or errors in interpretation of college regulations were so substantial as to effectively deny the student a fair hearing, or if new and significant evidence became available that could not have been discovered by a properly diligent student before or during the original hearing.
  • Cases may be dismissed if the finding is held to be unsupported by any evidence.

See the Sexual Misconduct policy for policies and procedures related to appeals for cases involving violations of the sexual misconduct policy.

Student Conduct Files and Records

Case referrals may result in the development of a student conduct file in the name of the respondent.

The outcome of all student conduct cases will normally be retained as a student conduct record for seven years from the date of the letter providing notice of the outcome. Files of students who are suspended or expelled will be retained.

The respondent or complainant may listen to a copy of the hearing recording upon written request. The respondent or complainant may request that a written transcript of their own hearing be prepared, at the student’s expense.

Student conduct records may be voided by the provost and executive vice president or designee, for good cause, upon written petition of the respondent.  Factors to be considered in review of such petitions include:

  • The present demeanor of the student.
  • The conduct of the student subsequent to the violation.
  • The nature of the violation and the severity of any damage, injury, or harm resulting from it.
  • The completion of sanctions from all prior incidents.

Campus Crime Reports and Registered Sex Offender Information

In accordance with the Campus Sex Crimes Prevention Act, the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act, and the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, colleges and universities are required to disclose certain timely and annual information about campus crime, security policies and procedures, and registered sex offenders. Schools must publish an annual report every year by October 1 that contains three years of campus crime statistics and certain public safety policy statements. This report is made available to all students and employees at www.howardcc.edu/services-support/public-safety/reports-forms/.

The Act amends the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 to clarify that nothing in that Act may be construed to prohibit an educational institution from disclosing information provided to the institution concerning registered sex offenders; and requires the secretary of education to take appropriate steps to notify educational institutions that disclosure of this information is permitted.

To find the sex offender registry for Maryland, go to www.dpscs.state.md.us/sorSearch or access the web link through HCC’s website public safety page listed above. This site provides information on registered sex offenders enrolled and/or employed at all Maryland institutions of higher education.

In addition, sex offenders are required to register at the college’s public safety office prior to registering for any course or program at HCC. The college will not hire any convicted sex offender; therefore, sex offenders should not apply for vacant positions. Disclosure of information provided to the public safety office will be provided to the executive vice president of administration and finance and the provost and executive vice president accordingly. Additional campus notifications will be initiated as deemed necessary. Failure to register with the college’s public safety office will result in disciplinary action including expulsion, as outlined in the Student Code of Conduct.

Academic Impact

A student suspended as a result of the student conduct process may be entitled to complete their academic work, including examinations during the regular term without extension of time. Since the student is prohibited from entering the campus without permission, coordination will be through the office of the provost and executive vice president and the division chairperson will be notified. An expelled student has no right to complete academic work.

Stalking and Harassment

Stalking, cyber stalking, and harassment are criminal offenses under Maryland state law and are prohibited at Howard Community College (HCC). HCC is committed to providing a safe and secure learning and working environment that is free from stalking, harassment, and other threats.

Stalking means the intentional, repetitive or menacing pursuit, following, harassment, or other interference with the peace or safety of another person of that of his or her immediate family members; including cyber-stalking. The State of Maryland defines stalking as “a malicious course of conduct that includes approaching or pursuing another where the person intends to place or knows, or reasonably should have known, the conduct would place another in reasonable fear of serious bodily injury, an assault in any degree, rape or sexual offense, false imprisonment, and/or death.”

Harassment means intentionally following another person in or about a public place without their consent or maliciously engaging in a course of conduct that alarms or seriously annoys the person with the intent to do so after receiving a reasonable warning or request to stop.

Stalking, cyber stalking, and harassment behaviors may include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Repeated, unwanted/unsolicited contact that includes face-to-face contact, telephone calls, voice messages, text messages, electronic mail, instant messages, written letters, or unwanted gifts;
  • Repeated, unwanted/unsolicited communication on public and college community internet sites;
  • Disturbing online messages;
  • Persistent physical approaches or requests for dates, meetings, etc.;
  • Threats that create fear for one’s life or safety, or fear for the safety of one’s family, friends, roommates, or others;
  • Unwanted touching;
  • Pursuing or following another person; repeatedly showing up or waiting outside a person’s home, classroom, place of employment, or car;
  • Using surveillance or other types of observation, either in person or through the use of electronic devices or software to track or obtain private information;
  • Harassing another person, either in person or through a third party;
  • Using threatening gestures;
  • Trespassing or breaking into a person’s vehicle or residence; or
  • Vandalism or destruction of a person’s personal property.

This applies to all students, employees, and visitors equally. The college reserves the right to administer additional sanctions to an offender if the incident affects the academic or work environment of the college. College disciplinary procedures are independent of any and all criminal procedures. A substantiated charge against a student or employee of the college will subject that person to disciplinary action.

Sexual Misconduct

Sexual Misconduct Policy

Sexual misconduct is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by state and federal laws, including Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 as amended (“Title IX”) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, and also may constitute criminal activity. Sexual misconduct is an umbrella term that includes sexual and gender-based harassment or discrimination, sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence, sexual exploitation, and stalking. Howard Community College (HCC) prohibits and will not tolerate sexual misconduct. HCC recognizes that sexual misconduct damages the integrity of the educational institution, destroys the institution’s positive work and educational atmosphere, and causes psychological and physiological damage to those involved. The college condemns such activity and is strongly committed to providing a learning and working environment free from any form of sexual misconduct.

HCC promotes a climate that is free from sexual misconduct through training, education and prevention programs. The college promotes prompt reporting, prohibits retaliation, and ensures timely, fair, and impartial investigation and resolution of reported sexual misconduct. Any employee, student, vendor, or affiliated person who engages in sexual misconduct in violation of this policy will be subject to disciplinary action including but not limited to dismissal from a class, suspension or expulsion from the college, termination of a contract or debarment in the case of vendors, or termination in the case of employees.

All college community members are subject to this policy, regardless of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. This includes all college students, faculty, and staff, as well as third parties and contractors under the college’s control. Violations of the policy may occur between individuals or groups of individuals of any sexual orientation or actual or perceived gender identity. This policy applies to sexual misconduct in connection with any college program or activity, including: (1) in any college facility or on college owned or controlled property; (2) in connection with any college sponsored, recognized or approved program, visit or activity, regardless of location; (3) that impedes equal access to any college education program or activity or adversely impacts the employment of a member of the college community; or (4) that otherwise threatens the health or safety of a member of the college community.

Any type of retaliatory or intimidating behavior against a person participating in a protected activity because of their participation in that protected activity is expressly prohibited by this policy. HCC takes strong disciplinary action against any individual or group of individuals found responsible for retaliating or intimidating, or attempting to retaliate or intimidate, another person for making a report , opposing in a reasonable manner an act or policy believed to constitute discrimination or harassment, or testifying, assisting, or participating in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing related to a protected activity. Any concern of retaliation should be reported immediately and the college will promptly investigate.

The college encourages HCC community members who have questions about Title IX or who want to make a complaint regarding sexual misconduct to contact one of the Title IX co-coordinators: Dr. Shantay Grays, provost and executive vice president and Dr. Tyria Stone, executive vice president of administration and finance. The deputy Title IX coordinators are Ms. Zakia Johnson, associate vice president of student development and social support and director of student conduct and Ms. Christy Lee Koontz, associate director for student conduct and compliance. Dr. Grays (sgrays@howardcc.edu) can be reached at 443-518-4809. Her office is located in McCuan Hall, room 260 (MH 260). Dr. Stone (tstone@howardcc.edu) can be reached at 443-518-4749. Her office is located in The Rouse Company Foundation Student Services Hall room 220 (RCF 220). Ms. Koontz (ckoontz@howardcc.edu) can be reached at 443-518-3182. Her office is located in The Rouse Company Foundation Student Services Hall room 331 (RCF 331). Ms. Johnson (zjohnson@howardcc.edu) can be reached at 443-518-4079. Her office is located in The Rouse Company Foundation Student Services Hall room 320 (RCF 320). The most up to date contact information for these individuals can be found on the college website in the staff directory.

HCC community members may also direct questions to the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights. Additionally, HCC community members may report incidents to any HCC non-confidential college employee because all HCC non-confidential college employees have been designated responsible employees and are required to report any information they receive regarding sexual misconduct to their supervisor and to HCC's Title IX co-coordinators or the HCC deputy Title IX coordinators. The college employees who are designated as confidential include: employees of HCC Counseling Services licensed for and acting as personal counselors and employees licensed for and acting in a medical capacity for a patient.

A student who reports an incident of sexual misconduct, either as a complainant or a third party witness, will not be held responsible for violating the Student Code of Conduct if the student was under the influence of alcohol or drugs at the time of the incident. An employee under similar circumstances would not be disciplined under college procedures if the report was in good faith. HCC does not want the fear of receiving disciplinary charges or disciplinary sanction to prevent a student or employee from reporting an incident of sexual misconduct.

Sexual Misconduct Procedure

Howard Community College (HCC) has established the following definitions and procedures regarding sexual misconduct:

I. Definitions

• The term "student" as defined for the sexual misconduct procedure includes all individuals accepted for admission to any credit or noncredit course or degree granting program sponsored by the college. Student status continues until a student has not enrolled in a course or program for two consecutive academic years.

• The term "complainant" usually means a person who filed the complaint against the respondent or has been affected by the alleged sexual misconduct. In matters of serious misconduct requiring a hearing by the student conduct committee, the complainant may be the provost and executive vice president or designee. In cases involving employees, the complainant could be an employee, a student, or a representative from the human resources office.

• The term "respondent" is defined as the individual, either student or employee, accused of violating the sexual misconduct policy.

A. Definitions of Prohibited Forms of Sexual Misconduct:

1. Sexual Harassment is any unwelcome sexual advance, unwelcome request for sexual favors, or other unwelcome verbal, written, online, or physical conduct of a sexual, sex-based, and/or gender-based nature when: (1) Submission to or rejection of such conduct is made, either explicitly or implicitly, a term or condition of an individual’s basis for or evaluation of academic work, employment, or participation in any aspect of a college program or activity (2) Such conduct has the purpose or effect of creating a hostile environment. A hostile environment is created when harassment is severe, or pervasive or persistent, and objectively offensive such that it unreasonably interferes with, denies or limits someone’s ability to participate in or benefit from the college’s educational program, employment, or activities. Sexual harassment may include, but is not limited to the following: (1) verbal harassment or abuse; (2) pressure for sexual activity; (3) unwelcome touching; (4) suggesting or demanding sexual involvement accompanied by implied or explicit threats concerning one’s grades, job, etc.; (5) displaying pornographic or sexually suggestive images in a place or manner where others could view such images and be offended; (6) using sexually suggestive language in a place or manner where others could hear such language and be offended; or (7) threatening to commit a violation of sexual misconduct against another person.

2. Sexual Assault is any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient. Sexual assault can include incest, non-consensual sexual contact, and non-consensual sexual intercourse as defined by this policy. A) Incest is sexual intercourse between persons who are related to each other within the degrees wherein marriage is prohibited by law. B) Non-consensual sexual contact is any intentional sexual touching, however slight and with any object or body part, by a person upon another person, or exposure or disrobing of another, that is without consent (as defined in Sexual Misconduct Procedure 63.01D.01) or by force or coercion. This includes intentional contact with breasts, buttocks, groin, or genitals, touching another with any of these body parts, making another touch the respondent or themselves with or on any of these body parts, as well as any other intentional bodily contact that occurs in a sexual manner. C) Non-consensual sexual intercourse is any sexual penetration or copulation, however slight and with any object or body part, by a person upon another person, that is without consent (as defined in Sexual Misconduct Procedure 63.01D.01) or by force or coercion. Intercourse includes anal or vaginal penetration by a penis, object, tongue, or finger, and oral copulation (mouth and genital/anal contact), no matter how slight the penetration or contact.

3. Sex Offense is any act or behavior which fails to comply with or violates sexual offenses as defined by Maryland law.

4. Sexual Exploitation means taking non-consensual or abusive sexual advantage of another to benefit anyone other than the person being exploited. Examples include: Sexual voyeurism (such as watching a person undressing, using the bathroom or engaged in sexual acts without the consent of the person observed), invading privacy, prostituting another person, going beyond the boundaries of consent (such as letting someone hide in a closet to observe consensual sex or disseminating sexual pictures without the photographed person’s consent), taking pictures or video or audio recording another in a sexual act, or in any other private activity without the consent of all involved in the activity, engaging in sexual activity with another person while knowingly infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a sexually transmitted disease (STD) or infection (STI) without informing the other person of the infection, administering alcohol or drugs (such as date rape drugs) to another person without their knowledge or consent, sexually-based stalking or bullying, or exposing one’s genitals in non-consensual circumstances.

5. Dating Violence means violence or threat of violence between individuals who have been or are currently in a personal and private social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature. The existence of such a relationship will be determined based on a consideration of the length of the relationship, the type of the relationship, and the frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship.

6. Domestic Violence means violence committed by a current or former spouse or intimate partner, by a person with whom a child is shared in common, by a person cohabitating with or who has cohabitated with the individual as a spouse or intimate partner, by any other person similarly situated to a spouse, or any other person against an adult or youth protected from those acts by domestic or family violence laws of Maryland. Domestic violence includes threats or a pattern of abusive behavior of a physical or sexual nature by one partner intended to control, intimidate, manipulate, humiliate, frighten, coerce or injure the other.

7. Stalking means a course of conduct directed at or the intentional, repetitive or menacing pursuit, following, harassment of another person, or other interference with the peace or safety of another person or their immediate family members that would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety or the safety of others or suffer substantial emotional distress; including cyber-stalking. The definition of stalking also includes intentionally following another person in or about a public place without their consent. Stalking, harassment, and cyber-stalking behaviors may include, but are not limited to: (1) repeated, unwanted/unsolicited contact that includes face-to-face contact, telephone calls, voice messages, text messages, electronic mail, instant messages, written letters, or unwanted gifts; (2) repeated, unwanted/unsolicited communication on public and college community internet sites; (3) disturbing online messages; (4) persistent physical approaches or requests for dates, meetings, etc.; (5) threats that create fear for one’s life or safety, or fear for the safety of one’s family, friends, roommates, or others; (6) unwanted touching; (7) pursuing or following another person, repeatedly showing up or waiting outside a person’s home, classroom, place of employment, or vehicle; (8) using surveillance or other types of observation, either in person or through the use of electronic devices or software to track or obtain private information; (9) harassing another person, either in person or through a third party; (10) using threatening gestures; (11) trespassing or breaking into a person’s vehicle or residence; or (12) vandalism or destruction of a person’s personal property.

B. Definition of Consent:

Consent is defined as permission to act. It may be given by words or actions, so long as those words or actions create clear, voluntary, mutually understood permission to engage in (and the conditions of) sexual activity. Consent must meet all of the following standards:

• Active, not passive. Silence, in and of itself, cannot be interpreted as consent. There is no requirement that an individual resist a sexual act or advance, but resistance is a clear demonstration of non-consent.

• Given freely. A person cannot give consent under force, threats, or unreasonable pressure (coercion). Coercion includes continued pressure after an individual has made it clear that they do not want to engage in the behavior, they want to stop the behavior, or that they do not want to go beyond a certain point of sexual interaction.

• Provided knowingly. Legally valid consent to sexual activity cannot be given by:

  1. A person under the legal age to consent (16 years old in Maryland) or
  2. An individual who is known to be or, based on the circumstances, should reasonably be known to be- mentally or physically incapacitated. The question of what the respondent should have known is objectively based on what a reasonable person in the place of the responding party, sober and exercising good judgment, would have known about the condition of the complainant. An incapacitated individual is someone who cannot freely make rational, reasonable decisions because the individual lacks the capacity to understand the “who, what, when, where, why, or how” of a sexual interaction. This includes a person whose incapacity results from: being mentally disabled, asleep or passed out, involuntarily physically restrained, physically forced, unconscious or having a blackout, or beaten; feeling scared, physically forced, intimidated, coerced, threatened, or isolated; or having ingested, inhaled, or been injected with date rape drugs, or using alcohol or other drugs. Possession, use, or distribution of any drugs, alcohol, or similar substances without the consent of the person consuming them is prohibited, and administering a date rape drug to another individual is a violation of this policy. A respondent’s level of incapacitation will not diminish the respondent’s responsibility for needing to obtain consent.

• Specific. Permission to engage in one form of sexual activity does not imply permission for another activity. In addition, previous relationships or prior consent do not imply consent to future sexual acts. It is the responsibility of the initiator of the act to receive permission for the specific act. As a result, consent may be requested and given several times by multiple parties during a sexual encounter involving multiple acts.

• Consent can be withdrawn once given, as long as that withdrawal is clearly communicated.

C. Definitions Related to Implementation of Policy:

1. Retaliation is any adverse action, absent legitimate nondiscriminatory purposes, taken against a person participating in a protected activity because of their participation in that protected activity. Participation can include making a report, opposing in a reasonable manner an act or policy believed to constitute discrimination or harassment, or testifying, assisting, or participating in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing related to a protected activity. Retaliation includes retaliatory discrimination or harassment.

2. Interim Measures means reasonably available steps the college may take to protect the parties while a sexual misconduct investigation is pending.

3. Responsible Employee includes any college employee who (1) has the authority to take action regarding sexual misconduct; (2) is an employee who has been given the duty of reporting sexual misconduct; or (3) is someone another individual could reasonably believe has this authority or duty. HCC has designated all HCC non-confidential college employees as responsible employees. This includes: the Title IX coordinators and all Title IX team members, all non-confidential administrators, all professional and technical staff, all support staff, all faculty, all athletic coaches, and all college public safety staff members. The college employees who are designated as confidential include: employees of HCC Counseling Services licensed for and acting as personal counselors and employees licensed for and acting in a medical capacity for a patient.

II. Reporting Sexual Misconduct and Requesting Interim Measures

The college encourages individuals who have experienced sexual misconduct to report those incidents to the college’s Title IX Co-coordinators, or any responsible employee with whom the person who experienced the sexual misconduct feels comfortable. The college will address incidents that take place on college owned or controlled property, and all college departments, programs and college sponsored activities, including off-campus when the provost and executive vice president, associate vice president of human resources or their designees determine that the off-campus conduct affects a substantial college interest. A substantial college interest is defined to include any situation where it appears the student’s or employee’s conduct may present a danger or threat to the health or safety of self or others; and/or any situation that significantly impinges upon the rights, property or achievements of self or others or significantly breaches the peace and/or causes social disorder; and/or any situation that is detrimental to the educational mission and/or interests of the college.

A. Complainant Reporting

The college will offer complainants options for reporting the misconduct and requesting interim measures. The Title IX Co-coordinators and Title IX deputies are responsible for ensuring the implementation of appropriate interim measures and coordinating the college’s response with the appropriate offices on campus. The options for reporting sexual misconduct and requesting interim measures include:

• The complainant reports the misconduct to the Title IX coordinator or another college employee whom the college has designated as responsible for receiving or responding to reports of sexual misconduct. The complainant should be notified of the interim measures available and requests for interim measures can be made by the complainant to the Title IX coordinator or responsible employee. Reports of sexual misconduct to responsible employees will be forwarded to the Title IX Co-coordinator who will determine what steps need to be taken. Generally, the college will investigate the report to determine what occurred and the college will provide interim measures during the investigative process and any disciplinary or student conduct process.

• The complainant discloses the misconduct to an advocate through the office of the provost and executive vice president, the office of human resources, or the office of counseling and career services, who in turn can request interim measures from the college on the complainant’s behalf. Under the second option, complainants should be aware that when an advocate obtained through one of the above offices requests interim measures on their behalf from a responsible employee of the college and discloses that the reason for the request is sexual misconduct, the request may trigger the college’s Title IX obligation to investigate. To the extent the advocate through the office of the provost and executive vice president, office of human resources, or the office of counseling and career services makes such a disclosure, but, consistent with the complainant’s wishes, asks that the college not investigate or otherwise notify the respondent of the report, the Title IX coordinator or designee will consider whether it can honor the request while still providing a safe and nondiscriminatory environment for all students, and take interim measures to protect the complainant as necessary.

• The complainant, or the complainant’s advocate, requests supportive measures from the college without reporting the sexual misconduct to the college. While the college strongly encourages all complainants of sexual misconduct to report the incident to the college directly, the college wants complainants to have access to supportive measures regardless of when or whether they decide to report the conduct to the college.

• A student or employee who reports an incident of sexual misconduct will be informed of the right to file criminal charges with the appropriate law enforcement officials; provided with prompt assistance of campus authorities, at the request of the complainant, in notifying the appropriate law enforcement officials and disciplinary authorities of an incident of sexual assault, and the right to decline to notify such authorities; be given information regarding the importance of preserving evidence as may be necessary to the proof of criminal cases. This includes information that Howard County General Hospital, located at 5755 Cedar Lane, Columbia, MD 21044, is equipped with the Department of State Police Sexual Assault Evidence Collection Kit, which can be helpful in preserving evidence; receive full and prompt cooperation from campus personnel in obtaining appropriate medical attention, including transportation to the nearest designated hospital; offered counseling from mental health services from the institution, other sexual violence support services entities, or the nearest State designated rape crisis program; and after a sexual misconduct case has been reported, and upon request of the complainant, the transfer of the complainant to alternative classes will be made if such alternatives are available and feasible. Additionally, a student or employee who reports an incident of sexual misconduct will be informed of all relevant legal options including the right to file for a peace or protective order. To file for a peace or protective order, complainants should go to their local court house. Additional information about peace or protective orders can be found at www.mdcourts.gov.

A student who reports an incident of sexual misconduct, either as a complainant or a third party witness, will not be held responsible for violating the Student Code of Conduct if the student was under the influence of alcohol or drugs at the time of the incident. HCC does not want the fear of receiving disciplinary charges or disciplinary sanction to prevent a student from reporting an incident of sexual misconduct.

1. Contact information for on and off campus resources

(a) On campus resources

• Title IX Coordinator for students
443-518-4809
Office of the Provost and Executive Vice President
McCuan Hall 260


• Title IX Coordinator for employees
443-518-1100
Human Resources
Howard Hall 100

• Counseling, Career Services, and Job Assistance
443-518-1340
Rouse Company Foundation 302

• Public Safety
Emergency number- 443-518-5555
Non-emergency number- 443-518-5500
Rouse Company Foundation first floor

• Employee Assistance Program
1-800-EAPS (3277)
Contact Human Resources at 443-518-1100 for additional information

(b) Off campus resources

• Howard County Police Department
Emergency number- 911
Non-emergency number- 443-313-2200
3410 Court House Dr.
Ellicott City, MD 21043

• Hopeworks of Howard County
(410) 997–0304
9770 Patuxent Woods Drive, Ste. 300
Columbia, MD 21046

B. Third Party and Anonymous Reporting

Individuals who have become aware of a violation of this sexual misconduct policy that does not involve the individual directly should report the misconduct to the college’s Title IX Co-coordinator. If an individual wishes to report a violation of the sexual misconduct policy anonymously, the report should also be made to the Title IX Co-coordinator. Anonymous reporting may limit the college’s actions.

C. Notification of the Means of Reporting Sexual Misconduct and Requesting Interim Measures

The college will provide notification to the college community of the means of reporting sexual misconduct and requesting interim measures.

III. Interim Measures

Interim measures are those services, accommodations, or other assistance that the college puts in place for complainants or respondents after receiving notice of alleged sexual misconduct but before any final outcomes - investigatory, disciplinary, or remedial - have been determined. Some interim measures may become remedies for the involved parties after a final outcome of a sexual misconduct investigation.. The college wants its students and employees to be safe, to receive appropriate medical attention, and to get the help they need to heal and to continue to access their educational and employment opportunities. Upon receiving a report of sexual misconduct, the college will provide the complainant, or the complainant’s advocate, with a written explanation of the interim measures available on campus or through local community resources and will ask complainants, or their advocates, what measures are sought. The college will determine which measures are appropriate for a particular complainant or respondent on a case-by-case basis. If the complainant, the complainant’s advocate, or the respondent identifies an interim measure that is not already provided by the college, the college will consider whether the request can be granted. In those instances where interim measures affect both a complainant and the respondent, the college will minimize the burden on the complainant wherever appropriate.


A complainant, the complainant’s advocate, or the respondent may request the interim measures listed below. The college, after consulting with the complainant, the complainant’s advocate, or the respondent will determine which measures are appropriate to ensure the individual’s safety and equal access to educational programs and activities:
  • Academic accommodations such as change in class schedule and extended deadlines for assignments
  • Assistance in arranging for alternative college employment arrangements, physical office space alterations, or changing work schedules
  • A “no contact” directive. Such a directive serves as notice to both parties that they must not have verbal, electronic, written, or third party communication with one another.
  • Providing an escort to enhance safety for the parties involved in a process as they move safely between educational programs, employment, and activities
  • Assistance in identifying an advocate to help secure additional resources or assistance including on and off campus and community advocacy, support, and services.
  • Other interim measures deemed appropriate by the institution

The college will work with complainants or their advocates to identify what interim measures are appropriate in the short-term (e.g., during the pendency of an investigation or other college response), and will continue to work collaboratively throughout the college’s processes and as needed thereafter to assess whether the instituted measures are effective, and if not, what additional or different measures are necessary to keep the complainant safe.

If a complainant or a complainant’s advocate requests any of the above measures on the complainant’s behalf without disclosing that sexual misconduct is the basis for the request, the college will consider these requests for supportive measures consistent with its general policy of allowing advocates to seek such measures for those who have experienced sexual misconduct without requiring that the nature of the misconduct be disclosed.

IV. Investigation Procedure and Protocol

The college’s Title IX Co-coordinator, or their designees, are responsible for receiving, investigating, and coordinating the response to reports of sexual misconduct policy violations at HCC. Once the college knows or reasonably should know of possible sexual misconduct, it must take immediate and appropriate action, in accordance with its internal procedures, to investigate or otherwise determine what occurred through a prompt, fair, and impartial investigation and resolution. This obligation applies to sexual misconduct covered by this policy regardless of where the sexual misconduct allegedly occurred, regardless of whether a concurrent law enforcement investigation or action is pending, and regardless of whether a formal complaint is filed.

The college aims to complete investigations in a timely manner. Investigations can typically take between 30 and 50 days. The length of the investigation may be influenced by the complexity, severity and extent of the alleged conduct, whether there is a parallel criminal process, the academic calendar such as school closings, and the availability and responsiveness of participants in the process.

A number of college employees will be trained in conducting a formal investigation and may be designated by the Title IX Co-coordinator to assist as appropriate and if needed. As part of the investigation, the investigator(s) will meet with the reporting party to gather as much information as available about the alleged violation. The investigator(s) should additionally interview anyone involved with the alleged violation in order to collect evidence and information. The investigator(s) will make a determination about how to address the alleged behavior.

Both the complainant and the respondent in an investigation have equitable rights to review evidence and participate in meetings specific to the investigation.

A request for confidentiality by the individual reporting alleged sexual misconduct may limit, but not prohibit, the college’s ability to limit the effects or prevent recurrence of alleged sexual misconduct. The college reserves the right to proceed with any aspect of the sexual misconduct process, including but not limited to an investigation, interim measures, or student conduct hearing, when the complainant does not choose to proceed. When making this decision, the college will consider whether there is a risk to the greater college community, the risk that the respondent will commit additional acts of sexual misconduct, whether there has been other sexual misconduct complaints against the respondent, whether the respondent threatened further sexual misconduct against the complainant or others, and whether the sexual misconduct was committed by multiple respondents. The college also reserves the right to delay, for the respondent, conferring of degree, certification, or letter of recognition and access to official transcripts until completion of the sexual misconduct process.

V. Resolution Procedures

A. Informal Resolution Procedures

An informal resolution is a process whereby remedies and interventions may serve to address the alleged conduct without proceeding to an investigation and adjudication. An informal resolution, including mediation, is not appropriate in sexual violence cases and will not be used at the college. Sexual violence includes sexual assault, dating violence, and domestic violence. Neither party is required to accept responsibility for the alleged conduct in order to proceed with an informal resolution. Either party may decide not to proceed with informal resolution and may request an investigation and adjudication at any time. The Title IX Co-coordinator or designee has the discretion to determine whether a complaint is appropriate for an informal resolution and retains discretion to terminate an ongoing informal resolution process at any time. The purpose of an informal resolution is to take appropriate action by imposing individual and community interventions and remedies designed to maximize the complainant’s access to educational, extra-curricular, and/or employment activities at the college; and/or to address the effects of the conduct on the larger college community. Any combination of interventions and remedies may be utilized, including but not limited to:

• Increased monitoring, supervision, and/or security at locations or activities where the alleged conduct occurred or is likely to recur; 

• Targeted or broad-based educational programming or training for relevant individuals or groups; 

• Academic modifications for complainants;

• Workplace modifications for complainants;

• Completion of projects, programs, or requirements designed to help the respondent manage behavior, refrain from engaging in prohibited conduct, and understand why the prohibited conduct is prohibited;

• Compliance with orders of no contact that limit access to specific college buildings or areas or forms of contact with particular persons.

The imposition of remedies or interventions obtained through an informal resolution may be achieved by an agreement acceptable to the parties and college. The Title IX Co-coordinator or designee will facilitate the development of this agreement. In such cases where an agreement is reached, the terms of the agreement are implemented and the matter is resolved and closed. In cases where an agreement is not reached and the Title IX Co-coordinator or designee determines that further action is necessary, or if a respondent fails to comply with the terms of the informal resolution, the matter may be referred for investigation and adjudication. Where the complainant, respondent, and the college have reached an informal resolution agreement, the parties will be provided with a written copy of the agreement. Accepting an informal resolution does not mean that the respondent admits responsibility; nor does it mean that there has been a finding of a policy violation. The Title IX Co-coordinator or designee will maintain all records of matters referred for informal resolution.

B. Grievance and Adjudication Procedures for Complaints Against Students

Any alleged violation of this sexual misconduct policy may be adjudicated under the procedures outlined by the HCC student code of conduct in the case of an alleged violation by a student at HCC. These procedures may also be used to address collateral misconduct occurring in conjunction with harassing or discriminatory conduct (e.g., vandalism, physical abuse of another, etc.). The procedures, participants, sanctions and appellate process all apply to these proceedings related to alleged violations of this policy. However, to the extent such procedures are not otherwise specified or are in conflict with any procedures outlined by the HCC student code of conduct, the following procedures specific to the adjudication of violations of this sexual misconduct policy will apply:

  • The parties to the proceeding will have equitable rights including: notice of allegations and hearings to both parties; an opportunity for both parties to present witnesses and other evidence, such as information about the specific alleged violation but not about the complainant’s prior sexual conduct with anyone other than the respondent.
  • The investigator(s) for the incident will serve as a non-voting member(s) of the student conduct committee panel.
  • For hearings related to an alleged violation of the sexual misconduct policy, neither the complainant nor the respondent are required to be present in the same room. Accommodations, including but not limited to listening to and participating in the hearing over the phone, may be made to allow either party to participate in the process without being present at the hearing location. Further, neither the complainant nor the respondent need to participate in the hearing as a prerequisite to proceed with the hearing. Failure of the complainant or respondent to appear at the hearing, after proper notice, will result in the committee making a decision through the hearing process in their absence.
  • The respondent cannot cross examine or personally question the complainant, and the complainant cannot cross examine or personally question the respondent. If the respondent or the complainant has questions for the other party, they may submit those questions to the hearing chairperson during the hearing. The hearing chairperson may use the submitted questions to inform which questions the hearing panel asks.
  • The parties will be afforded similar and timely access to information to be used during the proceeding.
  • Medical and counseling records are privileged and confidential documents, which students will not be required to disclose as evidence for the discipline process.
  • The parties are entitled to the same opportunities to have others present during the proceeding, including the opportunity to be accompanied to any related meeting or proceeding by an adviser of their choice. For proceedings related to an alleged violation of the sexual misconduct policy, the adviser of choice can include legal representation. The adviser’s role is to provide personal counsel and support to the respondent or complainant, but not to present the case or address the hearing panel, hearing Chairperson or other participants in the process. The adviser may not serve as a witness in the conduct proceeding. Disruptive advisers will be removed from the process at the discretion of the hearing Chairperson or investigator, and the process will continue. If the adviser does not appear at the hearing or related meetings, after proper notice to the complainant or respondent, the process will continue in the adviser’s absence.
  • The preponderance-of-the-evidence (i.e., more likely than not) standard will be applied as the standard of review for determining findings of fact and used in any Title IX fact-finding and related proceedings, including any hearing.
  • Evidence of a prior consensual dating or sexual relationship between the parties by itself does not imply consent or preclude a finding of sexual misconduct.
  • The appeal process will be equally available to both parties.
    • Either party has the right to appeal the outcome of the complaint if not satisfied with the result. The appeal must be filed in writing within seven business days of the outcome or resolution. Appeals involving a complaint of sexual misconduct made against a student should be filed with the provost and executive vice president. The appeal should state the reason(s) for the appellant’s belief that the outcome is unsatisfactory and provide evidence to support those reasons.
    • Appeals will only be granted (1) when sanctions are substantially disproportionate to the offense, where mitigating factors warrant a reduced sanction or aggravating factors warrant a greater sanction; (2) if procedural errors or conduct of the investigation were so substantial as to effectively deny fundamental fairness; or (3) if new and significant evidence became available that could not have been discovered by a properly diligent party before or during the original investigation. If an appeal is granted based upon new and significant evidence, either party will have the opportunity to respond to the evidence. If one or more of the above criteria are met, the vice president will review the appeal and issue a written decision within 30 days after its receipt. The decision of the vice president is final.
    • The vice president will act on appeals based upon the report filed by the hearing committee chairperson or designee, the student’s written brief, and any written response or memorandum prepared by college officials. All written materials considered by the vice president will be subject to inspection, in accordance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. New evidentiary hearings will not be conducted in appeals.

Any party participating in a proceeding may raise issues related to potential conflicts of interest of investigators or other individuals participating in the adjudication process by contacting the Title IX Co-coordinator or designee.

As permitted by law, the college will notify the parties concurrently, in writing, about the outcome of the complaint and whether or not sexual misconduct was found to have occurred. The college will also concurrently inform the parties of any change to the results or outcome that occurs before the results or outcome become final, and the institution must inform the parties when the results or outcome become final. In addition, HCC will not require either participant to abide by a nondisclosure agreement in writing or otherwise that would prevent the re-disclosure of information related to the outcome of the proceeding.

Institutional sanctions as outlined in the HCC student code of conduct include:

  1. Letter of warning.
  2. Fines: Previously established and published fines may be imposed.
  3. Restitution of property or personal relationships with others, denial of certain privileges, or restriction of activities.
  4. Loss of privileges – Denial of specified privileges for a designated period of time.
  5. Discretionary sanctions: Including, but not limited to, work assignments, essays, service to the college, mandated assessment and/or counseling, workshop attendance, behavioral contracts, and monitoring or related activities.
  6. Student conduct probation: Prohibits the student from representing the college or participating in student activities without prior permission from the office of student conduct. Probation also subjects the student to immediate suspension if found in violation of another offense during the period of probation.
  7. Administrative withdrawal from course(s): Student is withdrawn from the course(s) where the violation occurred for the remainder of the academic term.
  8. Suspension: Exclusion from college premises, and other privileges or activities, as set forth in the suspension notice.
  9. Expulsion: Permanent termination of student status, and exclusion from college premises, privileges and activities.
  10. Revocation of admission and/or degree: Admission to or a degree awarded by the college may be revoked for fraud, misrepresentation, providing other false information, or other violation of college standards in obtaining the degree or admission to the college

C. Adjudication Procedures for Complaints Against Employees

Charges of sexual misconduct against employees will be investigated by a trained investigator either from within the Human Resources Office or in another campus department, under one of two models:

  1. An investigation will be conducted and its findings will be reported to the Title IX Co-coordinator in the Human Resources Office. The Title IX Co-coordinator in the Human Resources Office will make a decision regarding the outcome of the investigation.
  2. The Title IX Co-coordinator in the Human Resources Office will conduct the investigation independently and make a decision regarding the outcome of the investigation.

The investigatory model used will be chosen by the Title IX Co-coordinator and will depend on the resources available at the time of the complaint and the nature of the complaint. In either model of investigation, the following will apply:

  • The preponderance-of-the-evidence (i.e. more likely than not) standard will be applied as the standard of review for determining findings of fact and used in any Title IX fact-finding and related proceedings.
  • The parties to the proceeding will have equitable rights including: notice of investigative meetings; an opportunity for both parties to present witnesses and other evidence, such as information about the specific alleged violation but not about the complainant’s prior sexual conduct with anyone other than the respondent; the opportunity to suggest questions to be asked of the other parties in the proceeding; similar and timely access to information to be used in making a decision.
  • The parties are entitled to the same opportunities to have others present during the proceeding, including the opportunity to be accompanied to any related meeting or proceeding by an adviser of their choice. For proceedings related to an alleged violation of the sexual misconduct policy, the adviser of choice can include legal representation. The adviser’s role is to provide personal counsel and support to the respondent or complainant, but not to present the case or address the investigator. Disruptive advisers will be removed from the process at the discretion of the investigator, and the process will continue. If the adviser does not appear at the meeting, after proper notice to the complainant or respondent, the process will continue in the adviser’s absence.
  • Both parties will be notified of the outcome of the investigation concurrently, to the extent possible.
  • Outcomes of investigations that result in recommendations for suspension or dismissal of employees will follow HCC policy and procedures described under 63.12 (Suspension and Dismissal Policy).
  • Either party may appeal the decision of the Title IX Co-coordinator in writing to the executive vice president of administration and finance (EVPAF). The written appeal must be submitted to the EVPAF within 15 calendar days of the date the original written decision is issued. The EVPAF will determine the steps in the appeal review, and will issue a decision in a timely fashion. The decision of the EVPAF is the final decision of the college’s internal process. For cases involving the EVPAF, the President will manage the appeal. In cases where the suspension or dismissal of an employee is recommended, the appeal process outlined under policy 63.12 will supersede the appeal process outlined above.

Possible sanctions for outcomes of this process are:

  1. Discretionary sanctions
  2. Suspension
  3. Termination

VI. Prompt Resolution

If there is a determination that sexual misconduct has occurred, prompt and effective steps to eliminate the sexual misconduct, prevent its recurrence, and address its effects will be taken.

• Prompt generally means within 60 calendar days from the time a report is brought to the college’s attention until an initial decision is rendered.

• There may be circumstances that prevent the college from meeting the 60-day timeline. In such circumstances, the college will document the reasons why it was unable to meet the 60-day timeline.

VII. Training

A. Prevention and Awareness Education

The college will develop and implement preventive education directed toward both employees and students. These educational initiatives will contain information regarding what constitutes sexual misconduct, definitions of consent and prohibited conduct, the college’s procedures, bystander intervention, risk reduction, and the consequences of engaging in sexual misconduct. These educational initiatives will be provided for all incoming students and new employees. The college will also develop ongoing prevention and awareness campaigns for its students and employees addressing the same information.

HCC will provide on-going education and awareness information about this sexual misconduct policy and related procedures through student orientation, workshops, handouts, letters, poster campaigns, and other outreach activity targeted at the general student population, including athletes and other campus leaders, and employees.

B. Annual Training Related to Implementation of Policy

HCC employees will receive biennial training on how to report incidents of sexual misconduct as well as how to effectively support complainants. In addition, public safety personnel, the Title IX coordinator, Title IX deputies, campus investigators, and participants in the adjudication process will participate in appropriate annual training to assist them in meeting their responsibilities related to implementation of this policy.

VIII. Title IX Compliance Oversight

A. Title IX Coordinator

The president will appoint a Title IX coordinator or Co-coordinators responsible for coordinating the institution’s efforts to comply with and carry out its responsibilities under Title IX.

The Title IX coordinator must have adequate training on the requirements of Title IX, including what constitutes sexual misconduct, consent, credibility assessments, and counter-intuitive behaviors resulting from sexual misconduct. The coordinator must understand how relevant institution procedures operate and must receive notice of all reports raising Title IX issues at the college.

B. Title IX Team

The Title IX coordinator or designee may identify a Title IX team, which may include the Title IX coordinator, Deputy Title IX coordinator, Title IX investigators, and representatives from campus public safety and the office of human resources. The Title IX coordinator or designee will be responsible for coordinating the activities of the Title IX team.

C. Notice of Nondiscrimination

1. Content

The college will publish a notice of nondiscrimination that contains the following content:

a. Title IX prohibits the college from discriminating on the basis of sex in its education program and activities;

b. Inquiries concerning the application of Title IX may be referred to the college’s Title IX coordinator or designee or the Office for Civil Rights; and

c. The Title IX coordinator and any Title IX team member’s title, office address, telephone number and email address.

2. Dissemination of Notice

The notice will be widely distributed to all students, employees, applicants for admission and employment, and other relevant persons. The notice will also be prominently displayed on the college’s website and at various locations throughout the campus, and must be included in publications of general distribution that provide information to students and employees about the college’s services and policies. The notice should be available and easily accessible on an ongoing basis.

IX. Record Keeping

The college will maintain records of actions taken under this policy, including, but not limited to, records of any reports of sexual misconduct, records of any proceedings or resolutions, and records of any sexual misconduct trainings, and will maintain such records in accordance with the college’s records retention schedule.

Non-Academic Complaints

Procedures for Howard Community College (HCC) students to address non-academic complaints are addressed in the student handbook and the catalog, which are available on the college website.  These procedures are reviewed annually by the office of the provost and executive vice president prior to publication of the student handbook and the catalog. There is a separate process for filing each type of non-academic complaint.

 

Procedures related to filing complaints regarding violations of college policy on non-discrimination, equal employment opportunity or affirmative action and violations of sexual misconduct are outlined in the procedures 63.01.01, Discrimination Complaint and 63.01D.01, Sexual Misconduct.

 

HCC students with disabilities who have complaints regarding physical accessibility of campus or provisions for academic accommodation can follow the grievance procedures outlined in the Disability Support Services Student Handbook available on the HCC website.

 

Procedures for challenging the content, release, or withholding of student records are outlined in college policy 50.05, Confidentiality of Student Records. If, after following these procedures, a student alleges failure by the college to comply with the requirements of the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) of 1974, the student can file a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education.

 

The procedures for handling complaints regarding the student services area (i.e., academic support services; admissions, advising and transfer athletics; Children’s Learning Center; counseling and career services; disability support services; financial aid services; records, registration, and veterans affairs; student life; test center, and campus services) are outlined in the student handbook available on the HCC website.

Discrimination Complaint Procedures

The following procedures are adopted to process complaints alleging violations of Howard Community College’s (HCC) policies on non-discrimination, equal employment opportunity, equal educational opportunity, or affirmative action and will be in addition to any complaint or charges an employee, applicant or student files with law enforcement or county, state, or federal agencies. These procedures apply to all complaints of discrimination or harassment, excluding sexual misconduct, made against either an employee or a student. Complaints of sexual misconduct will follow the procedures outlined in the college's sexual misconduct policy.


Initiation of Complaint

Any employee or employment applicant who alleges a violation of college policy on non-discrimination, equal employment opportunity, equal educational opportunity, or affirmative action by an employee should file a complaint in writing, including the grounds for the complaint, with the associate vice president of human resources. If the complaint is against the associate vice president of human resources, the reporting person should file the complaint with the executive vice president of administration and finance. Any student who alleges a violation of college policy on non-discrimination, equal employment opportunity, equal educational opportunity, or affirmative action must file a complaint in writing with the provost and executive vice president.

Complainants should be aware that the college is obligated to make its best effort to investigate each written complaint, even if the complainant does not desire an investigation. The college is also obligated to conduct its own investigation in cases where law enforcement or county, state, or federal agencies are also investigating. A complainant's request for anonymity during the investigation will be honored to the extent possible, but the complainant should be aware that protecting anonymity may hamper the investigation.


Investigation of Complaint

HCC will conduct its own investigation of discrimination complaints and will respond to the complaint, regardless of the reporting party.

The associate vice president of human resources, or the executive vice president of administration and finance, will investigate complaints made against an employee, and the provost and executive vice president or designee will investigate complaints made against students. In cases where the parties in the complaint involve both employees and students, the investigation may occur jointly between the associate vice president of human resources and provost and executive vice president or their designees.

During the investigation all parties in the case are allowed the same opportunity to obtain legal representation and present evidence and witnesses. The investigators will use the "preponderance of evidence" standard to evaluate whether discrimination or harassment occurred. The investigators will issue their written outcome of the complaint within 60 calendar days after the initial written complaint is received, barring unusual complexity or delays. Each party in the case will receive the written outcome. If criminal conduct is suspected to have occurred, the college may refer the matter to law enforcement if they are not already involved.


Appeal Process

Either party has the right to appeal the outcome of the complaint if not satisfied with the result. A written appeal must be filed in writing to the president of the college within 15 calendar days after the initial outcome is received. The appeal should state the grounds for the appellant's belief that the outcome is unsatisfactory. The president will review the appeal and issue a written decision within 30 calendar days after its receipt. The president's review may or may not include meetings with either party or any witnesses or participants in the case. The president's decision on the appeal is final.


Confidentiality and Reprisals

All parties and staff will keep the complaint, fact-finding process and outcome confidential, except to the extent that it is necessary to investigate and process the complaint. Furthermore, all student records and access to student records will comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA).

Persons filing complaints of harassment or discrimination will be protected against reprisals by actions that are appropriate to the circumstances.


False Complaints

Those persons who are found filing deliberate false complaints will be subject to disciplinary action.

Disciplinary Action
Substantiated complaints of violation of the policies referenced above may subject the offending party to disciplinary action. Employee disciplinary action will follow guidelines outlined in policy 63.12, Suspension and Dismissal. Student disciplinary action can include, but is not limited to, suspension or expulsion.

 

Drugs and Alcohol on Campus

Howard Community College (HCC) provides a healthy, safe, and secure educational environment. Employees are expected and required to be in appropriate mental and physical condition for work. Students are expected to contribute to the desired environment by conducting themselves within the guidelines of the student code of conduct.

The unlawful manufacture, distribution, sale, possession, or use of illicit drugs and the illegal use of alcohol on campus or as a part of any HCC activity whether on or off college premises is prohibited in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Under no circumstances shall any employee or student be under the influence of any drugs or alcohol in the workplace, while on college property, or at college-sponsored events. HCC recognizes that the use of medical marijuana outside of the workplace by a legally registered user is permitted in Maryland under certain circumstances and with proper documentation. As such, employees and students who are found to legally possess medical marijuana on college property, with proper documentation, will not be subject to disciplinary measures. However, under no circumstances may an employee or student manufacture, use, sell, or distribute medical marijuana in any college-controlled property or during any college-sponsored events, and the legal usage of medical marijuana outside of college property must be done in a fashion that does not lead to impairment on college property or at college-sponsored events.

HCC will not support employment or internship opportunities whereby there is a connection with the cultivation, production, sale, or distribution of marijuana or Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-infused products. This is in accordance with the Congressional Bill H.R.3614, section 1213 that indicates, “Amends the Higher Educational Act of 1965 (HEA) to bar an institution of higher education from receiving funds or any other Federal financial assistance, including any federally funded or guaranteed student loans, unless it certifies to the Secretary that it has adopted and implemented a program to prevent the use of illicit drugs and the abuse of alcohol by students and employees.” This prohibition is to ensure HCC’s compliance with federal law.

Employees who show evidence of being under the influence of drugs or alcohol while in the workplace, on college property, or at college-sponsored events may be subjected to an immediate drug or alcohol screening in accordance with college procedure 63.11.04, Employee Drug and Alcohol Testing. Evidence of being under the influence consists of actions, appearance, speech, or odors that reasonably cause a supervisor to believe that the employee is impaired. If an employee appears otherwise impaired in a way unrelated to drugs or alcohol, see procedure 63.10.11, Fitness to Work. “Under the influence of alcohol” means a blood alcohol concentration equal to or greater than .07 percent. “Under the influence of drugs” means a confirmed positive test result for illegal drug use, or the misuse of legal drugs including the usage of medical marijuana without proper authorization and documentation, the usage of prescription drugs inconsistent with authorization, or the usage of any legal drug to the point of being impaired from the performance of the employee’s assigned duties.

Violations of this policy by employees or students will result in disciplinary action, consistent with college policies. In addition, any violations may have legal consequences consistent with federal, state, and local law and the college will cooperate with appropriate health and law enforcement agencies.

HCC does not want the fear of receiving disciplinary charges or disciplinary sanction to prevent a student or employee from reporting an incident of sexual misconduct. A student who reports an incident of sexual misconduct, either as a complainant or a third party witness, will not be held responsible for violating the Student Code of Conduct if the student was under the influence of alcohol or drugs at the time of the incident. An employee will not be subject to disciplinary action for reporting or serving as a witness regarding an alleged incident of sexual misconduct that occurred while the employee was in violation of this procedure, provided that the report is made in good faith.

The college recognizes drug or alcohol abuse as a potential illness and major health problem, as well as a potential safety issue. Students and employees who need help in dealing with such problems are encouraged to use community or campus assistance programs. Voluntary participation in an assistance program alone will not jeopardize continued employment or enrollment at the college and will not be noted in the personnel or student record provided that job or classroom performance or behavior is consistent with established standards. However, voluntary participation in an assistance program will not prevent disciplinary action for violation of this policy, nor will it prevent corrective action for performance or behavior problems in the workplace or classroom before, during, or after participation in an assistance program.

In accordance with college procedure 63.09.16, Duty of Employees to Report Arrests, Charges, and Convictions, a college employee who is arrested, charged, or convicted of a crime involving legal or illegal drugs, driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or driving while impaired by drugs or alcohol must report the action to the associate vice president of human resources within 72 hours.

The efficacy of the policy is evaluated on an annual basis by human resources.

Alcohol Abuse Procedure

Howard Community College employees and students are expected to be free from the influence of alcohol while in the workplace, on college property, or at college-sponsored events. Open or non-sealed containers of alcohol are not permitted on college-owned or controlled property, or at any college-sponsored program or activity, whether on-campus or off-campus except under the conditions specified in procedure 70.01.02, Alcohol on Campus and Liquor Licenses. Guidelines for students are detailed in the student handbook.

Employees who show evidence of being under the influence of alcohol while at the college may be subjected to an immediate alcohol screening in accordance with college procedure 63.11.04, Employee Drug and Alcohol Testing. Evidence of being under the influence consists of actions, appearance, speech, or odors that reasonably cause a supervisor to believe that the employee is impaired. “Under the influence of alcohol” means a blood alcohol concentration equal to or greater than .07 percent.

Employees or students who violate this procedure will be subject to disciplinary action.